Focusing a 1µm Galvo Fiber Laser Marking Machine

Accurate focusing of any laser marking machine is fundamental to achieving a successful laser mark.

When the laser marker is precisely focused, the resulting optimally sized focal point will deliver maximum resolution, higher energy density, higher productivity and a consistent mark with a desirable aesthetic.

A laser marker that is incorrectly focused will not only produce an undesirable result but it will potentially work at a far slower rate too, having a significant adverse impact on productivity.

For this reason, with every laser engraving machine that we manufacture we incorporate an electronic Z axis to which the beam deflection unit (scan head) is mounted, which is controlled by our software so that the user can precisely focus the laser.

Systems that incorporate a manual method of focusing (not controlled by software) are much more prone to operator error.

Even worse, with poorly designed machines where the worktable is moved to focus the laser rather than the scan head, significant errors are almost guaranteed. This is especially common where machines use a ‘lab jack’ type table that is often never perfectly level and/or can move during the laser marking process, especially when heavier items are loaded to the machine.

The problem of inaccurate focusing of the laser is compounded where the laser source is lower in power because any loss of energy density will be a significantly larger portion of the overall laser power. Therefore, it’s somewhat true that lasers of a higher power are more forgiving if they are used out of focus compared to the same machine fitted with a lower power laser source.

For some applications it can be desirable to deliberately defocus the laser. For example, when laser marking stainless steel with a near to black annealed effect, defocusing a machine by several millimetres can actually enhance the effect.

Marking with an intentionally defocused laser can also prevent unwanted material ablation that would otherwise occur with a perfectly focused laser. For example, when laser marking food packaging (coding), such as the foils used to wrap ice-creams, a perfectly focused laser can pierce the foil and deliver a very narrow mark that is harder to read where a defocused laser is less likely to pierce the foil and the larger focal point will provide for a wider character that is easier to read.

Also, when some products require marking at exceptionally high speed and high resolution is not a priority, using a defocused laser with a larger focal point size can allow for a lower hatch density, providing for a much faster mark. This technique can be used, for example, for marking of cattle tags.

In summary, precise control of focusing the laser is often critical to achieving the best overall result.

At Lotus Laser Systems we manufacture a wide range laser marking and engraving solutions ideally configured for laser cutting, laser marking and laser engraving all types of materials. Our experts would be happy to recommend which configuration best suits your application.

A simple Explanation of Laser Safety Classifications within a Laser Marking or Laser Cutting Machine

Almost all manufacturing equipment has inherent safety risks. For most types of machinery these risks are obvious, easily identifiable through visual or audible inspection.

The laser source within a laser marking or laser cutting machine cannot be monitored by the user visually or audibly without the use of special equipment. Therefore, there are specific safety classifications given to laser devices so that the degree of hazard can be understood and the risks mitigated to avoid accidents.

All laser devices must be labelled to identify the level of laser safety hazard, called the laser safety class.

There are 4 laser safety classes according to the degree of risk with Class 1 being the lowest risk and Class 4 being the highest risk. Within some of these classes are a number of sub-classes specific to the system configuration, in particular the laser wavelength and/or its AEL (Accessible Emission Limit) i.e. the degree of power emitted from the laser and the exposure time before it becomes hazardous.

By far the greatest hazard to the user is the risk of damage to eyesight. This can be permanent or temporary depending on the power and wavelength of the laser as well as the AEL.

Other risks relate to damage to materials biological, for example damage to skin, or non-biological as well as the risk to cause fire and/or explosion when coming in to contact with flammable or combustible materials such as petroleum, flammable gases, etc.

Within a laser marking, laser engraving, or laser cutting machine the laser source at any wavelength is always Class 4. The Class 4 laser hazard can be reduced by the addition of extra safety measures and devices built around the laser source.

Class 1 defines the laser marking machine or laser cutting machine as being of the lowest risk. A Class 1 laser machine can be operated in almost any environment suitable for an electronic device and emits no harmful laser radiation whatsoever.

To meet the requirements of Class 1 the laser hazard must be contained within a 'light tight' enclosure with all access panels being used for general operation interlocked and all service panels being secured with screws, or similar semi permanent fixings, so that opening of the service panels requires the use of a tool.

When an interlocked access panel is open an indicator must show that the system has moved from Class 1 to Class 4 and power to the laser must be removed so as to prevent accidental operation.

Class 2 is essentially the same as Class 1, however, this type of machine incorporates a visible guiding laser at <1mW. Typically this will be a red guiding laser at the 655nm wavelength.

Class 3 is not typically applicable for a laser marking or laser cutting machine and is more commonly found assigned to equipment incorporating a very strong, visible guiding laser typically at 5mW.

Class 4 is the most dangerous of all the laser safety classes. A Class 4 laser marking machine exposes the user to potentially immediate and harmful laser radiation as well as adds risk for damage to materials that can combust and/or explode. Use of a Class 4 laser must be restricted to a specifically designated and appropriately signed area, segregated from the general work area. Operators of Class 4 lasers should be specially trained and advised of the risks as well as wear specifically configured PPE while working in the designated Class 4 area.

In a perfect world only Class 1 or Class 2 laser marking or laser cutting machines would exist but in some circumstances the safety enclosure becomes an obstacle to the process. In such case Class 4 lasers are required, however, a Class 4 laser should never be operated without the owner and user being fully aware of the safety risks and having in place safety measures to prevent unnecessary accidents.

At Lotus Laser Systems we manufacture a wide range laser marking and engraving solutions ideally configured for laser cutting, laser marking and laser engraving all types of materials. Our experts would be happy to recommend which configuration best suits your application.

Why to Use the 9.3µm Wave length for Laser Marking and Laser Cutting

The vast majority of gas lasers in use today are CO2 lasers operating at the 10.6µm wavelength where there are literally hundreds of thousands of lasers working every day for laser marking, laser engraving and laser cutting applications.

In recent years some of the main laser technology manufacturers have introduced a more specialised version of their 10.6µm lasers modified to operate specifically at the 9.3µm wavelength.

Some materials, such as Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for example, can be laser marked at the 10.6µm wavelength but will react better at the slightly shorter 9.3µm wavelength.

PET is a thermoplastic best known as a material to manufacture synthetic fabrics for clothing (commonly known as polyester) and it is also used to manufacture bottles containing drinking water, carbonated pops, fruit juices and other beverages.

In the case of a beverage bottle the vessel must be marked with coding such as date of manufacture, date of expiration (use by date) as well as other variables such as product type and batch numbers. Laser marking is a great technology for this process as a laser engraved code can be applied directly to the PET vessel so that it is wear resistant, fast, cheap, difficult to alter/counterfeit and eco-friendly to produce as there are no inks involved.

Using a 10.6µm laser marking machine to mark PET directly creates a clean, glossy mark with some material ablation. When filled with liquids that are highly transparent, such as water for example, the 10.6µm laser engraved code can be low in contrast and therefore hard to read.

When the bottle is filled with a carbonated beverage the engraved (ablated) area can cause a weak spot that in some cases can cause the vessel to fail and the liquid escape, wasting the product completely. This is an increasing problem as bottling plants move towards thinner walled vessels to aid in lowering material use and product cost/weight.

Using the same laser marking machine but at the 9.3µm wavelength creates a different material reaction where the laser marking is frosted in appearance without any ablation taking place, thereby increasing the contrast and readability of the mark no matter what the contents are and reducing the risk for failures of the vessel near to zero.

PET is also used in some specialist applications. For example, it can be combined with PVC to make a film used for the hologram on a credit card. Here, a specifically configured laser cutting machine at the 9.3µm wavelength can kiss-cut the surface film without piercing its backing film with a far cleaner edge and less adverse heat reaction than a similar machine would produce with a 10.6µm laser. Therefore, using the 9.3µm laser for this laser cutting process increases output quality while simultaneously reducing waste through rejected parts.

At Lotus Laser Systems we manufacture a wide range laser marking and engraving solutions ideally configured for laser cutting, laser marking and laser engraving all types of materials. Our experts would be happy to recommend which configuration best suits your application.

Why Laser Marking is Fast Replacing Printing

For many years Continuous Ink Jet printing (CIJ) has dominated the industrial sector for coding applications such as, for example, applying time/date/batch codes to food and beverage packaging.

During recent years, laser marking technology has seen a significant improvement in both performance and reliability simultaneous to a lowering of prices. These advancements now make laser marking a viable alternative to CIJ.

In terms of the code itself, laser marking offers many advantages over CIJ.

The CIJ process utilises ink, which as a consumable is costly to purchase over time and the printing heads of CIJ must be constantly cleaned and/or replaced too. A laser marker has no consumables, so running costs are far lower, as is the requirement for maintenance.

The low requirement for maintenance of a laser marking machine can mean that it’s a far more reliable method compared to CIJ and the fact that the laser uses no ink makes the laser marking process more environmentally responsible too.

In cases where the mark requires the application of logos as well as simple coding, here the laser is often a much better solution. CIJ is very limited as to what type of mark it can produce and over what area but a laser marking machine can deliver a wide variety of graphic formats from logos to barcodes to simple text and over a much bigger area too than a CIJ can apply.

For the mark itself, a laser mark is permanent and difficult to counterfeit. CIJ is quite the opposite; for example, when coding milk cartons by CIJ it is common for the mark to rub off as the carton is exposed to temperature changes, condensation and wear. A laser mark is resilient to such things.

A laser marker can also be easier/better to integrate to production lines. With CIJ the head is commonly positioned close to the surface to which it is printing. With a laser marking machine it is possible to place the beam deflection unit (sometimes known as the scan head) several hundred millimetres away from the product being marked.

A laser mark can add significantly to the perceived value of the item itself. For example, for a recent project we configured a fiber laser marking machine to brand stainless steel razor blades. Historically the blades were marked by CIJ. The aesthetic of the laser mark was significantly better, raising the perceived value of the item itself and addressing the counterfeiting issue our customer was having with their product marked by CIJ.

CIJ is a single process solution; i.e. it is simply a surface print. In some cases it’s possible for the laser to code and produce other processes at the same time such as, for example, perforation of packaging or cutting of thin films

At Lotus Laser Systems we manufacture a wide range laser marking and engraving solutions ideally configured for laser cutting, laser marking and laser engraving all types of materials. Our experts would be happy to recommend which configuration best suits your application.

When to Use a DC or RF Laser for Laser Cutting

At the heart of every 10.6µm laser cutting machine is the laser source. For low power (<100w) laser cutters there are two different types of laser source most commonly available.Both are essentially gas lasers emitting a laser at the 10.6µm wavelength but here the similarity ends. We cover the specification and manufacture differences between these technologies in other articles.

The oldest, most stable and reliable, highest performing laser is the RF variety. A high quality RF excited laser can produce excellent beam quality with a very short (fast) rise/fall time. This makes the RF laser ideal for laser cutters where the process needs to be delivered at high speed.

RF lasers are also much better for applications that require a high degree of detail to be cut. This is because when the motion system slows down to turn an acute angle or change in direction, to avoid burning-out the material where the motion system turns/dwells the laser power must be ramped down proportionally. DC lasers are difficult to control when ramping, often producing unreliable results.

The high-speed pulse of the RF laser is also much better suited for laser cutting materials that react adversely to overheating where the RF laser will minimise this undesirable reaction. For example, laser cutting wood with an RF laser can produce a cleaner edge than when using a DC laser. Another example would be the laser cutting of thin materials, such as laser cutting veneers where too much heat can cause the material to warp. Using an RF laser will again minimise this adverse effect.

Another preferred application for using an RF laser is where the cutting control needs to be very precise: for example, the laser kiss-cutting of labels where the laser cuts the surface material but not the backing paper. This application can require the use of very low laser power, even just a few watts. All gas lasers do not work well when the duty cycle falls near to or below 10%. For DC lasers at 60w we find they do not perform well below 30% (18w), which is often too much power for kiss-cutting.

A DC laser is best applied to laser cutting materials that work well with heat and where the duty cycle is almost always 100%. For example, laser cutting acrylic, especially at thickness >3mm (1/8”) where the slower pulse and greater heat of the DC laser can be an advantage. In this example a DC laser will often laser cut acrylic with a far smoother edge than its RF alternative.

Of course, DC lasers being a fraction of the price of the RF alternative means the user can afford to use a far higher DC laser power than the nearest cost RF alternative closest in price. This means that using a higher power DC you can cut thicker materials much faster. For example, one of our 30w RF machines actually costs more money than the same machine fitted with a 100w DC laser. In this example, the DC version would cut thicker materials near to three times faster.

At Lotus Laser Systems we manufacture a wide range laser marking and engraving solutions ideally configured for laser cutting, laser marking and laser engraving all types of materials. Our experts would be happy to recommend which configuration best suits your application.